{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/17/2018 6:13:33 PM
23
Should games with Microtransactions and Lootboxes be Free to Play?
Hey Gaming Community!
Just asking a simple question to get people's opinions on the matter! Should games, whether they be "Triple A" or Indie, be Free to Play if they have Microtransactions and/or Lootboxes?
Leave your thoughts below and be sure to vote! Thanks for reading and have a nice day!
-
4 RepliesI'm fine with games costing $60, having DLC or whatever, and also having MT's in them. As long as I'm not required to spend that extra money to play the game I don't mind. Games like Assassin's Creed: Origins do a good job with them and you can buy gear if you want, but it's not needed to play through the game. I really didn't even mind how Shadow of War did MT's honestly. You earned money in game to buy certain types of boxes and if you wanted top of the line orc's or gear without having to play you could spend real money. The reality is that lootboxes and MT's are here to stay whether it's with F2P games or paid games. When you look at the revenue paid games generate with MT's a company would be stupid to not include them in the game. If a publisher steps over the line, the gaming community corrects them like they did with Battlefront 2.
