{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by blakeischowder:
1/1/2015 12:26:54 AM
23
Baby Hitler
If baby Hitler is sleeping peacefully in his crib, do you kill him?
-
omg why did you steal my tag you -blam!-ing monster
-
Nope. For the reason that even though what he did was horrible, a lot came out of WW2. The fact that we were able to go to space, and have tons of the things we have today, are mostly from scientist that were given exorbitant amounts of money to do research, And then they all came over here when his regime fell, bringing all that knowledge, over with them. To be honest if he would have waited to start his war 2-3 years later and still had all the scientist conducting research into missile design, weapon design, land infantry, jet propulsion, etc.. the allies would probably have lost badly. Good thing for his lack of patience and bad management, that most of the things that could have won him this conflict were already being developed too late to save his regime. I'm not saying he should've won, God forbid, but evil brings the good out of people. And all the evil he spread brought a lot of good. Too bad it was wasted in a pissing contest, that was the cold war.
-
1 ReplyEdited by Swiftlock: 1/1/2015 8:53:19 PMForget Baby Hitler, I'd be more pre-occupied with figuring out how I wound up in 1889 Austria.
-
Spike his ass like a football!
-
2 RepliesWait you can time travel. Take me to the year the traveler comes. I want to see the golden age. And no to answer your question, who knows if by going back in time you altered the past already and he ends up getting killed in WWI.
-
If you break a branch another one will take it's place.
-
Altering history could mean a far more sinister outcome.
-
He actually helped start a new age in advancements. I'd let things stay as they are as we're already living in this reality His influence as a leader and ability to take action is almost unheard of. He might be a piece of pooh, but killing him would have def changed our world in the present or future in advancements overall. Who's to say we wouldn't make things worse by altering an event? He was and is an undeniable influence of genius both negatively and in rapid advancements
-
Use his leadership gifts for good. Craft him into a force for good.
-
Honestly without Hitler as the driving force in 1938 Germany it would set us back ages in medicine and rocketry. For all the bad he did, He did pioneer some science or at least requisition for them to be pioneered.
-
3 RepliesNo, he was one of the greatest minds in the world it was just slightly mis-aligned
-
Did you get this from that short story by Edgar Allan Poe? I forget the name.
-
Edited by FUZZYMEXICAN659: 1/1/2015 7:46:12 PMIf he was a teenager sure, but I'm not killing no baby. Unless its the baby from "The mask".
-
Wrong forum.
-
3 RepliesNo. His death is a fixed point in time.
-
It would be immoral to kill a child regardless of what he/she will become. Still, this is a complex topic that I remember studying a while back....
-
I'd kidnap him and drop him off at the local synagogue
-
No. You would have no way of knowing what he would do in the future so you'd just be murdering a baby.
-
Lol you got pretty raged on by this topic, I would still say no because it's not our place to take someone's life.
-
No. That is wrong to think about killing an innocent, defenseless child. Even if he became a horrible dictator who caused the death of many.
-
3 RepliesNo, why is this a question? He became who he was because of certain factors in his life. Plus, if we went back in time and stopped WW2 from happening, lots of potentially dangerous things could happen to the present day.
-
Stupid ass topic.
-
#offtopic
