So my main goal in Destiny [before Patch 1.1] was to Purchase the Crucader II [New Monarchy] Scout Rifle Without going anywhere near Crucible. Because I want to play PvE. And I would have Earned the Crucader II MY WAY. Marks for Materials meant least meant I could at least access content even if it is a weapon exactly like another with a different ski and I was working for it my own way. I was also considering getting my Titan Kitted out in FWC gear as a homage to Halo Reach because thats how I would have got enjoyment from Destiny over the next 10 years. With an option Added to Pay Marks for Materials Means I could buy the Materials I did not wish to farm as an endgamer (20+) And other player could use the addition of Materials for Marks anyway they saw acceptable. You changed one for the other without indicating that was HOW you were going to Implement the Marks for Materials. EULAs since 1990s have said as a purchaser I do not own or have the right to access the content of THE SOFTWARE beyond the Authors Original Intent. This is the first time I've seen the the interperatation being enforced towards Use the SOFTWARE EXACTLY as the Author WANTS you to USE it. I thought I bought this for my Enterainment I'm pretty sure Bungie I do not enjoy PvP so I'm not going to play PvP. I've only had One Cruible Game (That My Fireteam Leader picked/Tried|Dropped In and then out of) I've avoided it other wise (I even Bailed on IB 1.0 while the party was forming) 0 Medal Points|0 Medals I thought Bungie had learned from their Atheon Revenge Patch [1.0.2.3] to Communicate better with the Community