{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/2/2014 1:40:23 AM
4
-
Edited by Beyond Evolution: 12/2/2014 1:46:39 AMI would explain the different reasons to have both, but doing so would really be redundant since I've explained it in over a dozen posts already. I'll just say that both exchanges served different purposes.
-
they didnt want a way to farm either from the other I suppose. and they know WE would find a way to break their system we always do.
-
A 5:1 exchange from one mark to the other seems reasonable to me. A way to trade the marks you have for the ones you need seems like a good option to have. (imo)
-
Edited by BiigDaddyDellta: 12/2/2014 1:57:09 AMa way to trade anything would be nice. if the exchange rate was the same so you could get no gain going back and forth I see that you do in fact have a good point. some people don't need mats.
