{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/21/2014 10:05:42 PM
1
I get that, but your personal experience of "sexuality" and the concept of such (and the other traits it should entail) is far greater than the few gays you have actually met. I've never been to Japan, but I know quite a lot about it, same sort of deal - I've had experience of it just not up close and personal.
English
-
Edited by Mr Mackey : 10/21/2014 11:23:25 PMI specifically said I was making a conclusion based on the fact that it was my own personal experience. I never said if it was a good conclusion, I was simply stating why I personally (WITHOUT USING FACTS BUT BY USING EXPERIENCE) generally dislike gay people. But of course at the notion that someone may have a different opinion than you, you seem to have your heart set that I am a homophobe and nothing I can say will change that.
-
Your conclusion is irrational. That's what I'm getting at. If I met a Chinese bloke and he robbed me, would it be logical to assume all Chinese are thieves based on my limited personal experience with an actual Chinese fella?
-
That would only be illogical if that wasnt the only Chinese person you knew. Literally all the openly gay people at my school act this way.
-
No, even if it is the only Chinese guy I know it is illogical because I can work out that [i]race[/i] is in no way related to [i]criminality[/i] in the same way that it is pretty clear that sexuality in no way makes you an 'SJW' or not.
-
How can you prove otherwise if you've never met/heard of/ seen a Chinese guy who hasn't committed a crime against you?
-
Reasoning. I know that race does not increase or decrease criminality. Therefore the fact he is Chinese is irrelevant to his criminality. Therefore it can be assumed not all Chinese are thieves. It's really simple stuff.
