{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/29/2014 9:34:42 PM
2
DLC is a fact of life in pretty much all games now. (thanks, CoD) I don't think it is great but I accept that it is part of life. If you think the game is too shallow in content as it is, have you beat all of the missions on all levels? Done the raid? Crucible has been 'beaten' somehow by you? I dunno. I'm not saying it is perfect but it isn't any worse than most MMO style games that don't go full MMO. The alternative is to pay $120 up front with all games if paying for DLC is your issue.
Wazznut's reply misses the point as well. His analogy would be more accurate if he said: it is like going to Disney land and finding out that I have to pay for shirts, drinks, food separate from my ticket which...guess what? Ya do. Before the game every came out, you knew DLC would be a part of the equation. Don't cry foul now that they are doing exactly what they said they'd do.
English
-
Don't thank CoD. Thank Activision which is the same disgusting publisher this game uses.
-
True enough that Activision is the publisher but CoD was the game that started the DLC trend. (and IW, who invented CoD is a wholly owned subsidiary of Activision) My point is that had DLC not been so wildly successful when CoD introduced it, it probably would not have caught on. Realistically we only have ourselves to blame for snapping this shit up when they put it on sale.
