{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by DaveyCrockett5000:
8/15/2014 11:07:03 PM
7
I have both PS+ (on PS4) and XBL. The PS+ and XBL are essentially the same quality. If you were talking original PSN on PS3 than yes, I would agree it's garbage. I think Sony realized that to have a competitive online service it can't be free.
Edit: I just realized your argument was about the community. If you don't recall, CoD and Battlefield (both shooters) are on both systems. I'd like to know where you're getting your "facts" from if all you have to compare are Killzone and Halo... and we all know Killzone is most likely on it's last leg.
English
-
The community hasn't changed though. One is superior in terms of shooters, the other is superior in terms of... tomb raider
-
Edited by DaveyCrockett5000: 8/15/2014 11:08:52 PMRead the edit I just did, I don't think you can base the shooter community off 2 games.
-
Two are examples, I will not list every game made as that is not feasible.
-
Well if the argument is about which console has a superior shooter community I guess we can all agree that we're all screwed by the PC gamers lol. They had online play before the original Live was even up, not to mention both Halo CE and Halo 2 were ported to PC.
-
Does not compute. Leave now! Ultimate argument detected. Leave now!!! Argh!!!!!
-
Will do lol
-
The reason his OP was shit
