{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
4/18/2014 9:00:51 PM
21
I don't think it's quite where Avengers was at and between it and IM1 is a bit of a tossup for me. Definitely one of the best cb movies and a huge improvement to the series after IM3 and Thor 2.
English
-
Edited by BannedLemön: 4/18/2014 9:16:38 PMThor 2 was pretty decent.
-
HA. HA. HA. You're wrong.
-
I wasn't aware that opinions were wrong.
-
They are, especially when it's something as bad as "Thor 2 was decent"
-
And I think your opinion if my opinion is wrong. See how this works?
-
Your opinion is wronger. Like Super Sayain Wrong.
-
-
OBJECTION
-
fat man pls
-
HOLD IT
-
but why?
-
It was pretty good but the problem is I think that was about the extent of their ambition. It felt like Thor 2 played it the safest of the entire franchise.
-
ick bore 2
-
no u Tom Hiddleston >>>> Chris Evans
-
born again samuel l jackson >>> all of bore 2 and regular man 3 combined
-
[quote]bore 2 and regular man 3[/quote] i lol'd
-
goji stahp
-
oh hush lemmy loki's cool, but he can't sell a movie to me
-
-
while iron man was great and avengers was fun, i don't think they're quite as good as cap 2 was. cap 2 understood the titular character [well one of them anyway, the other was criminally underused], kept a tense atmosphere throughout, and had a [i]ridiculous[/i] effect on the MCU.
-
Except for Spider man. Because no matter what happens in The Marvel Universe. Spider man will NEVER be mentioned. I would bet money that There will be no Mention of the NY invasion in The Amazing Spider man 2. Wonder if this is due to Sonys License.
