Who would you rather work for in a non-apocalyptic (or apocalyptic, your choice really) scenario? Express the reason for your answer below.
[url=http://fc08.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2012/117/d/1/aperture_science_wallpaper_by_habzs-d4xq1vo.jpg]Aperture Science[/url]
vs.
[url=http://fc00.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2011/308/e/8/black_mesa_motto_dark_background_by_ne1l-d4f2ol3.jpg]Black Mesa[/url]
[spoiler]If this generates enough attention I may start doing these once a week, each week two different video game entities are chosen, if you have suggestions post them below.[/spoiler]
I chose Aperture Science on a careful study of Cake to Chance of Death ratio. While Black Mesa has a low chance of death in a non-apocalyptic scenario, it also has a very low chance of cake where Aperture Science has a high chance of cake a medium chance of Death. These statistics add up to ratios of 0:1 for Black Mesa and 5:3 for Aperture Science.
-
WW2 Russia
-
[spoiler][i]The cake is a lie![/i][/spoiler]
-
I'd rather work for Raytheon Sarcos...
-
Don't know what they ate! ._.
-
Aperture Science. I'd rather take my chances with the neurotoxin than become a headcrab zombie.
-
Well this is awkward, apparently I posted this thread in the middle of a bump fest and no one saw it...
-
Black Mesa. I have a higher survival chance.
-
Black Mesa. What if I get to meet Gordon Freeman?
-
Aperture Science, since there is always science to do. Plus there will be cake. I mean come on!
-
Aperture Science. We do what we must because we can.
-
Edited by BannedPiranha: 3/6/2014 4:28:52 AMBlack Mesa, less chance of becoming a test subject for a deranged AI that way(or Cave Johnson for that matter).