JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Service Alert
Destiny 2 will be temporarily offline tomorrow for scheduled maintenance. Please stay tuned to @BungieHelp for updates.

OffTopic

Surf a Flood of random discussion.
originally posted in:Sociopaths United
12/15/2013 2:09:20 AM
7

Just saw Desolation of Smaug, here are my thoughts.

Okay, keeping it short and sweet, and spoilers you shouldn't care about because anybody who would go see this movie without reading the book first ought to just kill themselves. Things I liked: >They kept Beorn, who I was positive would be cut, in the same vein as Tom Bombadil. Though, with the way they padded this movie out, I guess they had no choice. >Smaug's design was very well done. I like how reptilian he looked, it's a nice change from the simian-faced dragons you see in a lot of movies. I appreciate the monitor lizard-like face. He's not bulky, either; but nice and serpentine, with humonguous wings. It really looks like something that could stay aloft for an extended period of time. >The effects were, as expected, top notch. There are one or two shots where you can see through things. But all in all it's a great looking film. Now, what I disliked: >This movie is literally 50% padding. Most of the time you spend watching watching it, you will be asking yourself why the hell they couldn't just make two films. Or, hell, just one! Single sentences from the book are turned into 15 minute scenes. >There's this whole, shitty romance subplot they've pulled out of their asses, it's cheesy as hell and from the moment the chick is introduced you can see what the filmmakers were up to. It feels really forced, and is only really there to pad things out. I'm kind of confused by the plot being there at all, since the Dwarf involved died at the end of the book, and they had him almost die of poisoning in this one. So it's going feel like a lot of time was wasted on him when he dies in the final film. >It really feels like there is no reason for Legolas to be in this movie. Which makes sense because, honestly,he [i]doesn't[/i] have any reason to be there. Overall, it's a decent film to watch solely from the mindset of a moviegoer, but as a Tolkein fan I feel frustrated by the way they dragged it out and embellished it with shitty movie cliche subplots and scenes.

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • So there's a dragon? I only watched the first movie for the dragon. And it only teased a dragon.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I just saw it. I thought it was quite a bit better than the first, but it still suffered from alot of the same problems it had. Not even close to the quality of the LOTR series. Also that abrupt ending was just awful.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by GKR: 12/15/2013 5:04:13 PM
    0
    Pretty much my thoughts as well, though I didn't mind the changes as much for the most part until the end. My favorite part of the film would have to be the climax of Gandalf's investigation at Dol Guldur. Even though much was Jackson's own added material, I didn't mind it until the last 40 or so minutes.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by Dafuq: 12/15/2013 4:46:20 PM
    When I saw the trailer and saw some elf bitch, Legolas, and Radagast still around I knew all was lost. Peter Jackson can go jump off a cliff.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • My thoughts exactly.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by Dovahkiin: 12/15/2013 12:33:40 PM
    Overall, a good movie. But I did have a few problems. At times the movie looked too cartoonish and fake at times. Especially when they led Smaug to Erebor's forges in order to drown him in liquid gold. However the ending is what really pissed me off. Though Ed Sheeran's performance in the credits did make up for the ending. That guy has got a beautiful voice. His 'I see fire' really captured the movie's tale imo. Also, Benedict Cumberbatch's performance also exceeded expectations. Smaug's menacing and powerful nature could be felt throughout the theatre.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by BaconShelf: 12/15/2013 11:46:56 AM
    You basically got my thoughts. I was surprised as I was expecting that there would be a subplot involving an uprising against The Master but then he's turned into a good guy. So that was cool. But Smaug was undoubtedly the highlight of the film. But there was way too much padding, I mean, it was two-and-a-half hours long! I don't think the first was near that! And the whole Gandalf-Sauron thing I wasn't too keen on.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon