{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Regretful123:
2/14/2013 2:44:54 AM
25
So after further study, it's something like this;
/990881___263143985.jpg
Edited: Added photo
English
-
I'm thinking if we activate all eastern standard time Nodes at 10AM tomorrow that should atleast fill out the number inbetween the 4 and the 9 if we cant get it tonight
-
It looks like it's actually 590881____6314_985
-
One, the first number can't be five, since if you carefully exam and compare the one that shows the number five, it has a bigger loop at the bottom. If you take a closer look at the number nine, you can see that the number fits well into the first value. As for the remaining pieces, there's another photo I attached somewhere in this thread. The image was taken earlier today by someone else who has the data inverted. It has a better reliable data to observe between the one I frequently checked and the one I compared with.
-
Edited by civilwargeeky: 2/14/2013 2:57:38 AMProbably dosen't matter, but for all its worth, the first number set is prime, and is a color in hex [url]http://www.colorhexa.com/990881[/url] 990881 Also, to add more conspiracy, the current sum of the numbers is 76, so maybe the others are 0, 0, and 1?
-
Can you confirm it by testing that theory on the previous two revealed image?
-
Ok. Yeah. Nevermind on those theories. First sum is 57, other is 50. The number set formed by the first six digits is not prime on the first one, but prime on the second one. Also, of course its a hex color. It has six numbers. Silly me.
-
but wan't the second image a QR code and not a url?
-
The eleven digits in the url from the solution page you go to. See if that sums up to digit 7 or 77.
-
Edited by adamj004: 2/14/2013 2:47:03 AMgreat stuff but it looks like the there are 4 missing numbers.
-
Edited by Regretful123: 2/14/2013 2:57:07 AMEdited; original post was edit or removed; We need more people around Canada or Greeland. Especially United Kingdom area. And QBIX where are you bro! I need you!
-
i got mixed up, made a mistake.
-
Are you certain that there are 3 missing numbers?
-
Edited by Regretful123: 2/14/2013 2:46:03 AMBump Odd chances are to have a two numbers in the hidden region, but it's possible. My best guess would have to be that particular three number.
-
I don't know if you can say with certainty that the '3' at the end, "...3985.jpg" is a 3.
-
You're right, I encounter this, but earlier today I had a previous layer that shows the inversed data. Let me show you that. I prefer the one I posted above better since this one wasn't clear as it seems. The more you flicker back and forth between the first image I posted above and the second image I embedded in this post, the more it seems like it's three.
-
Edited by Hylebos: 2/14/2013 2:46:17 AMOkay, I've got nothing to do this evening, let's try to bruteforce it. It's only 1000 possibilities, if we split it up, we can get it done.
-
Please do, I just wasn't sure about the angular spacing and I didn't want to take out a compass and verify.
-
Edited by gestuart88: 2/14/2013 2:41:51 AMThat brings it down to 1000 possible inputs, should we go for some man power? I was thinking it could be a 9,3,8, or 5
-
Edited by Regretful123: 2/14/2013 3:03:45 AMLet's wait until we get some data points from Europe. The more points, the merrier we can get the hidden numbers (I prefer to see the middle part or at least the buttom to get a approximation of how many number we're missing.)
-
I agree. Although it wouldnt take long for a group of 10 to try out 100 numbers a piece, we could make it much easier by using a Southern Hemisphere proxy to try and make up the ground needed.
-
From comparing the data at the moment, the middle value that I'm missing has a curve shaped bottom. Meaning that it comes down to the following values; 3, 5, 6, 8, and 0.
-
The thing that confused me is that the first two images both had a .jpg that was preceeded by 11 digits, while this .jpg looks to have 18. It may not matter, but I just wanted to point that out.
-
It doesn't have to be 11 digits. I think Bungie did this to prevent brute forcers to achieve early images before they are available at the time.
-
Each number has a curved bottom?
-
No, the three number I was looking for, out of the three, one has a curve bottom. Apparently someone found the image, it's 590881739283143985
