Hmmm… let’s see. Well, there is a downside to this. In order for it to be categorised as an attachment, it must be an emotional bond between two people that persists over a long period of time. As a Jedi, they likely would spend prolonged periods of time away from any children they may have. This isn’t good if the child’s primary caregiver is the Jedi. Prolonged separation during the early years of the child’s life could result in maternal deprivation, as Bowlby suggested. This could lead to impaired intellectual, physical and emotional development. This begs the question, is the rule against having attachments in place to encourage Jedi to commit to their roles as keepers of the peace, or to prevent psychological harm from being done to those who could be affected by Jedi commitments. That’s not to mention the potential trauma that could be experienced if the Jedi loses their life.