{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/9/2024 2:50:39 AM
64
How is this not the worst way to intro new maps?
I admit I am not great in Crucible. In skill based I am a 1.3 efficiency at best and that feels right to me. I have some fun, I play the objectives -- it works.
But, "Hey, here's some new maps and a quest, but you who suck have to play the best for at best 6 matches, probably should budget 12 matches of getting stomped, and this means you should keep playing Crucible"?
What was everyone thinking here?
-
1 ReplyI'm just not going to participate in Bungie's going back on promises yet again. They promised a map "pack" months and months ago. Then it turned into three maps. Three maps is not a pack just like three wolves is not a pack. I wouldn't have even minded if they had imported some of the better maps from D1. Then when it finally comes time to drop the "pack" it's walled behind 3v3 modes the Bungie knows most people don't actually enjoy and it requires a grind to unlock them. That's just bad game management. I've seen nothing yet that even shows they are actually trying to make a better game.
