I play much solo but even I can't understand why people complain about teams. I am by far not thw best player but most times I match up against teams they lose. 🤷‍♂️ If you are better than the enemies you can easily 1vs3 them. In quickplay a 5 or 6 stack can be annoying especially if your own team is playing not that smart.. but to be honest.. how often you are matching a 5 or 6 stack as a solo while your team is without such a big stack? 1 of 100 times or less? For me it feels like many people only search for excuses why they are losing. Especially because many people who want in trials sbmm (stupid in so many ways...) or act like they are only meeting cheaters ingame are in fact lying about their experience. If you track their matches you can see that they are not meeting cheater every game etc. . You just look at their loadout sometimes and you can find the reason they are losing so much 🙈 And if you tell them the truth? Already got people who blocked me after this, deleted their post and made a new one.

1. Freelance offers better connection quality than team alternative. True or not? 2. Freelance offers faster matchmaking times than team alternative. True or not? 3. Freelance allows lobbies to be balanced more evenly than team alternative. True or not? I'm not saying that the mixed pool does not work at all. I'm simply offering a version that is superior in every way.

I answered the first 2 questions with a clear "no" and I also explained that in my pther comment some sec. ago. The point #3 is in some ways true. But in fact for people like me freelance lobbies are lobbies to stomp bc most solos are not that good that's why one stronger person in the lobby could kill the whole "fairness" in freelance lobbies so easily. Instead of that you could also make matches fair by using better teambalance. Because that is a thing destiny never had. Idk how many times with CBMM back then I got a lobby full of solos and one team had a winchance from about 80% or higher. No one can tell me that there was any kind of good teambalance back then and no one can tell me there was no possibilty in those lobbies to make teams more fair. 🤷‍♂️ Freelance kills the "multi" in multiplayergames. We as solo players should adapt to a multiplayergame and not the game itself to us.

1. True 2. True 3. True No point arquing more here if you disagree with facts.

[quote]No point arquing more here if you disagree with facts.[/quote] Take your phone, use the selfie-camera and read that text of yours. 😉 I explained why I have this opinion you don't so stop telling me something about facts. 🤣 But if you want to talk about fact's: We never talked about your matches that did NOT have a big amount of teams while you talking about this situation is destroying your experience? How can something destroy your experience while it's not happen very often (said exaggeratedly)?

As a solo player, is the experience better if: a) you never match against teams b) you sometimes match against teams Assuming matchmaking is preferring connection, is the connection quality better if: a) everyone can be evaluated as a solo participant b) teams are evaluated by fireteam lead and team members can be from anywhere in the globe Can the lobbies be balanced more evenly if: a) lobbies are made purely from solo players b) lobbies sometimes have teams and team sizes vary

[quote]Assuming matchmaking is preferring connection, is the connection quality better if: a) everyone can be evaluated as a solo participant b) teams are evaluated by fireteam lead and team members can be from anywhere in the globe[/quote] c) The game is matching a team based on the connection from the team as a whole and not just from 1 player in the team. Playing with people over the whole world is never a good idea connectionwise whenever you are solo or not. Btw: Asking questions and just giving your own answers in a way like that is a very poor move to avoid having a conversation in which the other person got some answers that you might not like. ☝️Polemic strategy in a nutshell. As you said: It makes no sense to argue with a person who is denying the facts. 😉

I felt that you had hard time grasping quite simple concepts, so tried to make you think and hoped you would understand the bigger picture by asking the questions. Let's not waste any more of our time on this, we clearly think on different levels.