{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/8/2021 1:34:57 PM
20
[quote]I've tried multiple times to get into a fireteam for the new dungeon and I cant seam to get in... Can we please get a matchmaking option for grasp of avarice?
Put a level bar on it if need be like GM nightfalls... But please for the love of the traveller and all things holy make this activity a matchmaking one 😭😭[/quote]
The site you’re posting on has lfg.
English
-
[quote]The site you’re posting on has lfg.[/quote] Worthless reply. We don't play the game on the site, OPTIONAL matchmaking should be an in-game feature.
-
[quote] Worthless reply. We don't play the game on the site, OPTIONAL matchmaking should be an in-game feature.[/quote] You’re on the site right now. Access to the lfg isn’t an issue.
-
LOL, really? Is that your reasoning? That's what I call missing the point completely!
-
Edited by Bore: 12/8/2021 3:46:18 PM[quote]LOL, really? Is that your reasoning? That's what I call missing the point completely![/quote] You have access to lfg. That’s the point. Xbox also has it built into the console…
-
The point is that players want those activities to have matchmaking IN_GAME! At least start to pay attention to the thread.
-
Edited by Bore: 12/8/2021 4:09:42 PM[quote]The point is that players want those activities to have matchmaking IN_GAME! At least start to pay attention to the thread.[/quote] Mechanically difficult activities would have too low a completion rate for matchmaking to work. That’s what lfg is for. And we’ve already covered that you have access to that.
-
[quote]Mechanically difficult activities would have too low a completion rate for matchmaking to work. That’s what lfg is for. And we’ve already covered that you have access to that.[/quote] LFG = playing with randoms you've never played before. IN-GAME MATCHMAKING = playing with randoms you've never played before. CONCLUSION: LFG is the way to go. IN-GAME MATCHMAKING would never work. I really like your reasoning, very logical and solid. Congratulations!
-
Edited by Bore: 12/8/2021 4:26:16 PM[quote] LFG = playing with randoms you've never played before. IN-GAME MATCHMAKING = playing with randoms you've never played before. CONCLUSION: LFG is the way to go. IN-GAME MATCHMAKING would never work. I really like your reasoning, very logical and solid. Congratulations![/quote] Matchmaking and lfg are completely different. Let’s look at trials. Who has a higher win rate, an lfg team or a matchmade team?
-
Edited by CookieNiki: 12/8/2021 4:22:48 PM[quote]Matchmaking and lfg are completely different. [/quote] They're exactly the same = a team made with randoms that never played together. And this is an indisputable fact, like it or not.
-
[quote] They're exactly the same = a team made with randoms that never played together. And this is an indisputable fact, like it or not.[/quote] You avoided the question. Was it too hard for you?
-
What question? The Trials one? How's that relevant for PvE activities, which is what is in the discussion here? Also I don't even know what an "off team" means, in the first place, I'm not a PvP player.
-
Edited by Bore: 12/8/2021 4:25:54 PM[quote]What question? The Trials one? How's that relevant for PvE activities, which is what is in the discussion here? Also I don't even know what an "off team" means, in the first place, I'm not a PvP player.[/quote] It’s relevant, so answer it. Off was a typo for lfg.
-
I already said I don't PvP and I don't know what an "off team" is.
-
[quote]I already said I don't PvP and I don't know what an "off team" is.[/quote] I already fixed the typo. Go ahead and answer the question.
-
Edited by CookieNiki: 12/8/2021 4:31:29 PMI can't answer your question because I don't play PvP (which I already stated TWICE), which means I have no clue what the win rate is for each of the situations you mention. That said, even if LFG has a higher win rate (as you say it has) it also means that MM ALSO has a win rate, which means it works and it's a viable option for those that want to use it.
-
[quote]I can't answer your question because I don't play PvP (which I already stated TWICE), which means I have no clue what the win rate is for each of the situations you mention. That said, even if LFG has a higher win rate it also means that MM ALSO has a win rate, which means it works and it's a viable option for those that want to use it.[/quote] Lfg does have a higher win rate and no, MM having a win rate means absolutely nothing. Only which one is higher matters. In pvp, regardless of if you lose or not, you complete the match. That’s not how pve works though. Losing in pve is failing the activity. It doesn’t end and you get nothing. Do you know why lfg has a higher win rate than matchmade teams?
-
[quote][quote]I can't answer your question because I don't play PvP (which I already stated TWICE), which means I have no clue what the win rate is for each of the situations you mention. That said, even if LFG has a higher win rate it also means that MM ALSO has a win rate, which means it works and it's a viable option for those that want to use it.[/quote] Lfg does have a higher win rate and no, MM having a win rate means absolutely nothing. Only which one is higher matters. In pvp, regardless of if you lose or not, you complete the match. That’s not how pve works though. Losing in pve is failing the activity. It doesn’t end and you get nothing. Do you know why lfg has a higher win rate than matchmade teams?[/quote] Because "Must have 2.0kd, will be checking"?
-
[quote] Because "Must have 2.0kd, will be checking"?[/quote] That may play a small role, but communication is what truly separates it.
-
cool, and now put it INTO the game ?
-
[quote]cool, and now put it INTO the game ?[/quote] Agreed, and rumor is that it’s being worked on.
