{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/28/2021 10:44:54 AM
18
Fact: titans and warlocks will never be as good as hunters since 60℅ of the community play hunters. This means that with enough complaining they can get us nerfed, easy. Why does an arcstaff one hit? Arcstaff is like havoc but it lasts a little less time and is 100 times more dangerous. But people will still complain about titans due too the 60% rule I pointed out above. I have been on this game long enough too see how, titans and warlocks get nerfed nerfed nerfed and hunters get left alone or buffed non stop. Just look at stasis rn titan dog shit, warlock meh, hunter -blam!- YEA SHATTER DIVE IS BACK!
English
-
Agreed
-
Hunters are definitely the weakest class in terms of abilities, hence why they rarely see nerfs, because they tend not to ship with totally unfair team wiping abilities that come back instantly
-
Oh to be in this much denial.
-
The denial is vast with this one
-
Edited by Twin Inferno: 7/28/2021 6:41:49 PMThen why do Titans and warlocks have the highest win rate? They top over hunters and warlocks and Titans have better exotics and abilities/supers.
-
I haven't checked the stats, but if 60% are hunters, then the hunter win rate should be about slightly less than half, due to there being more of them and with that, more below average players than high skill players to bring the rate down compared to the smaller amount of people in the other classes.
-
Check to top of the forum web. I mean for class win rate I’d imagine they are somewhat in the middle bc yes you have sweats who play it and win and then you have blueberries who usually play hunters and bring it down so it’s stuck in the middle. But again sweats play all classes and Titans warlocks still have the highest win rate.
-
Delusion
-
Enlighten me
-
Yeah, all of that is b.s. puleed out of your ass. Just in D2 alone Hunters have received waaaay more nerfs than Titans. Titans have actually recieved buffs in D2. Not to mention bottom tree striker was absolute king for over a year and Titans STILL whined every time a Hunter managed to kill them. OeM still hasn't been properly nerfed and is still op. Bottom tree striker is still op. Behemoth is still op. Skullfort still ensured nonstop ohk punch in pvp and nonstop healing every punch with striker. Warlocks(of which I main atm) are the only class with an actual grievance. We get nerfed at the mere hint we might be pulling even except for one subclass which is only decent in pvp because of icarus dash. Hunter (of which I mained all Forsaken and part of Shadowkeep) has terrible abilities. Dodge and the quickness are it's only strength which is quite enough for a good player to take advantage of, but not for bad players. An easy mode bad player will always do better on Titan and that's why you don't main a Hunter.
-
The only bs is what you just typed
-
Ok then. Where did you saw these facts?
-
I played this game since it came out brother
-
Yeah, thats no evidence.
-
(no response)
-
[quote]Fact: titans and warlocks will never be as good as hunters since 60℅ of the community play hunters. This means that with enough complaining they can get us nerfed, easy. Why does an arcstaff one hit? Arcstaff is like havoc but it lasts a little less time and is 100 times more dangerous. But people will still complain about titans due too the 60% rule I pointed out above. I have been on this game long enough too see how, titans and warlocks get nerfed nerfed nerfed and hunters get left alone or buffed non stop. Just look at stasis rn titan dog shit, warlock meh, hunter -blam!- YEA SHATTER DIVE IS BACK![/quote] That’s not a fact actually. Right now warlock is leading with the highest performance stats. Hunter population is also no where close to 60%. You can’t call something a fact if you made it up, lol.
-
The hunter population is 60% other two are near 20 to 20
-
[quote]The hunter population is 60% other two are near 20 to 20[/quote] Except that’s not true and you’re unable to back any of it up. Again, you can’t call something a fact when you made it up.
