Some of you people get offended way too easily. if you read my genuine inquiry as a heated jab, then I suggest you read up on text etiquette. If I had all my text in caps then I could see your reasoning. I apologize regardless, but I do recommend a dosage of concrete and "hardening up" as we say in my country. As for your averages, 120Fps would have been your highs. I know this because of multiple acquaintances that have the 5700XT. the key problem areas in which most users of this thread have been referencing: tangled shore, tower, crucible etc. have always ran like trash on AMD graphics. the stuttering issues popped up after beyond light, ill give you that. although, simulation challenge issues are not one I have encountered myself. I don't know what the rest of your rig is, so there could a bottleneck elsewhere, but that is unique and I would DDU and clean your registry if I was you. RDNA2 is basically just a more efficient RDNA1, think rx 480 vs 580. if u compare clock for clock, there is virtually no difference. RDNA2s strengths are reduced power consumption and massively increased clocks as compared to RDNA1. Bungo lacks the programing ability to purposely make performance worse from a generational jump. AMD is dedicated to not having the plethora of driver issues they had with RDNA1.