{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by LieutenantSpanky:
9/20/2020 3:49:57 PM
11
A lot of people are going to disagree with this thought, but I think Bungie should have adopted a subscription-based monetary system like you see in MMOs. I truly believe Destiny would have been in a way better state. Making a game ftp just encourages developers to find alternate sources of income.
English
-
They explained that they specifically don’t want this. What you buy is what you own in Destiny. So instead of spending $10 monthly you are just paying $40-$70 for a whole year of content. And you keep it.
-
[quote]So instead of spending $10 monthly you are just paying $40-$70 for a whole year of content. And you keep it.[/quote] Sunsetting.
-
Except that content is free dumbass. Its been free for 2 years?
-
Imagine taking a comment on a video game forum so seriously lmao
-
What? Bro if you don’t want a response don’t comment.
-
Did I have an issue with someone responding? No. I just think its funny how worked up you got.
-
If they removed all microtransactions and made the fall expansions free and larger, and also made the seasonal content free, then maybe.
-
Then how would they make money? So you buy the game for 60 bucks and get free content forever? In your model destiny wouldn't exist.
-
If they had released Destiny from the start like this, it would have worked in the long run. However, we're past that due date.
-
I'd be willing to pay a subscription for a good game. But definitely not Destiny, not in it's current state at least.
-
Hahahahahahahahaha, I would love to see them try this. Who would pay a subscription for this trash. Even Bungie isn't that stupid.
