{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/10/2020 5:59:19 PM
4
Iron Banner feels no different to me now than it did before. Neither does any other Crucible mode, so I'm not sure what the issue people have is.
All Crucible modes have always been a means to an end for me. I'm playing IB for the pinnacles, I played Survival for Lunas and Recluse, I played whatever for Redrix... In other words, winning is never my focus.
Sometimes I leave lopsided matches, but most of the time it's easier just to stay.
English
-
If my teams gonna lose, I focus on personal performance. If I can walk away having had a decent match, I'm ok with that
-
[quote]Iron Banner feels no different to me now than it did before. Neither does any other Crucible mode, so I'm not sure what the issue people have is. [/quote] Well, your K/D is right there on the 50% mark when compared to the population. You're almost exactly average. And that's not a had thing. What that means is under SBMM, you matched average players. Under CBMM, since the vast majority of players are average, you'll match primarily avergae players with a few highs and lows here and there. So statistically, your experience should be [i]about[/i] the same between the two. Props to you for realizing it. Most people on these forums saw one negative game and went and blamed matchmaking immediately.
-
There's no way I'm ever going to "try" in Crucible. It's just tacked on PvP because "hey guys, we need PvP". Iron Banner for me is about pinnacle gear. Usually 2 pieces because the bounties are so lopsided that 2 get done while the other 2 are at like 20%.
-
Pretty much.
