Two big things struck me as off;
The first is the way you had your character’s emotions portrayed. Take this line;
[quote]”...” I can’t say anything.[/quote]
It’s kind of redundant. The “...” already implies you didn’t reply, so we don’t really need you to reaffirm that. Instead, elaborating on why you couldn’t say anything might’ve been better.
[quote]”...” I can’t say a word. Maybe I knew it was because he was right—that the old man cared for us in his own, flawed way.. Or maybe I didn’t like the way this guy acted like he knew him better than me.[/quote]
Alternatively, either the “...” or the “I can’t say anything..” would’ve worked on their own.
The other issue is the total lack of buildup. The protag either should’ve had more time alone with his thoughts, or the stranger should’ve been introduced in a less.. Sudden way, for lack of a better word.
Something like
[quote]“Oi, (protag), that you? What are you doing out in the rain?”
“I’m sorry, do I know you?”
“Oh, sorry, guess you wouldn’t remember. I’m a friend of your father’s.”[/quote]
The biggest piece of advice I can give here, though, is to remember that if you’re writing in first person, we should hear more of the protag’s thoughts. If you want us to be a bit distant, and not know what he’s thinking as much, I’d switch to third person.
English
-
Edited by Insane: 7/3/2020 12:20:55 AMThat was my biggest debate and the thing I have the most trouble with... third versus first person. Edit: Also..should I edit the post for corrections or just take the advice for next time...?
-
[quote]Edit: Also..should I edit the post for corrections or just take the advice for next time...?[/quote] Just take the advice for next time. Otherwise you might wind up Frankensteining your work. As for the first vs. third; First person has the advantage of letting us into the character’s head. We get their descriptions, their thoughts, etc. This can lead to the reader getting false information, such as never realizing another character’s faults/good bits because of the protag’s biases. Third person, on the other hand, provides a wider, more accurate view of the world. We can get told info the protag doesn’t know yet, get pointed out to details they wouldn’t notice, and what it’s biggest advantage is I think, we can switch perspectives, and temporarily follow other characters. HelloFutureMe did a great video on it, I believe. Might be worth a look.
-
From the looks of it third person would be better for the audience. First is just more natural to write...I’m thinking of switching to third for the next one and seeing how it looks.
-
[quote]From the looks of it third person would be better for the audience.[/quote] Not necessarily. First person stories can be powerful, and an unreliable narrator can be a great twist. That being said, with the current writing style, yeah, I’d probably go third. If you want to stay first, you’ll want to let us in the protag’s head a bit more.
-
[quote][quote]From the looks of it third person would be better for the audience.[/quote] Not necessarily. First person stories can be powerful, and an unreliable narrator can be a great twist. That being said, with the current writing style, yeah, I’d probably go third. If you want to stay first, you’ll want to let us in the protag’s head a bit more.[/quote] Ok. Thanks for the advice!