{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/3/2019 9:52:58 PM
4
They dont nerf because people are complaining.
They are looking at kill data and usage stats.
Looks like they found it too good or way overused.
English
-
Whatever reason they choose, the nerf wont solve the issue. There'll just be another weapon that takes the place of LH or NF.
-
Edited by DredLaP: 5/3/2019 10:06:54 PMA new meta. Some metas are better than others or less annoying. I expected this and have been using other weapons. Quit using spectral when BA dropped. Adapt and conquer. Gonna be fun.
-
This is a more valid reason tbf. If people are calling for changes because it's getting stale then I can get on board with that. I dont agree with the nerfing because it's good though, as it doesn't cure the issue, it just moves the issue to another weapon
-
Even truevanguard wanted change. Hcs are around 40% of kills. More than pulse and shotty together. They look at those numbers. My neighbor works for blizzard and we talking gaming. He says all devs try to spice stuff up and create new playtime by chasing new weapons. Cammy and drewsky spent an entire day chasing service revolvers. Felt like clever dragon. Lets hope it pays off and brings out friends back. Thats all i really care about. And player base stats are bad. Pvp going below 200k is bad for all of us.
