{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Capt Explodabob:
11/23/2018 8:49:31 AM
23
IGN Going After 76
[url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUyZslwZquA[/url]
You know that you've really shit the bed when even the clowns over at IGN are getting off by ragging on your game. What's even better is that the IGN stooge has some undeniably valid points. I wouldn't recommend giving them any clicks, but the link's there for those of you who are either a) a 76 fan who's looking to get a bit salty, or b) somebody seeking some good old fashioned schadenfreude.
To summarise—well done to Fallout 76, a game so shit that even video games "journalism" seems entertaining by comparison.
-
12 RepliesIf you take the "journalists" that criticized a game for having too much water seriously I question the validity of your arguments that Fallout 76 is bad. Passive-aggressive poking aside, it's really not as bad as people make it out to be without diving into all the technical problems individuals experience. The story is actually pretty good, even if a tad monotonous at times (Backtracking to the same spot at least 3 times does that...) has some interesting characters and lots of nice lore attached to it. Sure, no living human NPCs is a bit weird, but I honestly cannot truthfully say that having living ones would change the experience much. We all ignore them the second time around at earliest anyway, so why are they important again?
