JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

OffTopic

Surf a Flood of random discussion.
8/7/2017 12:54:53 AM
78

Irrefutable Flat Earth Proof: Clouds Behind The Sun

The above picture clearly shows that clouds occur [b]behind the sun[/b]. Before you say: "[i]KP, if the sun is that close airplanes would crash into it[/i]" remember: the sun is close, but not [b]that close[/b]. In Planar Models of [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geodesy]Geodesy[/url], the sun is smaller and much closer to earth, [url=https://flatearthandthought.com/2017/01/17/question-how-do-daynight-cycles-and-seasons-work-on-a-flat-earth/]where it orbits above its surface[/url]. Even working off the conservative estimate of the sun being 3000 miles from the surface of the earth, and several hundred miles in diameter, this allows ample amounts of space for air craft (which rarely exceed 60,00 feet) to travel without any danger of colliding with the sun. The implications of photos such as the above should cast aside any doubt in the mind of a reasonable spherist. Unfortunately, the grip of mainstream science is iron strong, and evidence manifestly obvious to a 5 year old invariably gets dismissed by indoctrination and circular reasoning in more "enlightened" adults. The picture also speaks volumes regarding the structure of earth's atmosphere. Obviously, the atmosphere is layered, with clouds occurring [b]both[/b] [i]in front[/i] and [i]behind[/i] the sun. Logically, the posterior (rear most) clouds are much larger and thicker than those occurring in front of the sun. It is the nearby clouds that we encounter while flying or climbing a tall mountain. The Sun orbits well beyond the nearest clouds, while the distant clouds are themselves well beyond the sun. So why dont we often see clouds behind the sun during the afternoon? Upper atmosphere clouds (the thicker more distant ones) tend to occur along the more distant fringes of the disk of the earth. As the sun recedes in its daily orbit across the surface of the earth (causing the sun set), the angle of light (relative to the observer) reflects from the earth, illuminating the distant "thick" clouds. This common, everyday picture completely blows heliocentric theory out of the water. The sun is clearly NOT massive OR distant. It is [i]smaller[/i] [b]and[/b] [i]closer[/i] to the surface of the Flat Earth. P.S. Before you try to explain away these pictures due to photographic "bleeding" of the camera lens, please read my blog post about the Nearby Sun Hypothesis. I deal with this criticism at the end of the article: https://flatearthandthought.com/2017/08/07/proof-behind-the-sun-flat-earth-sunsets/ Remember guys: [i]Trust Your Senses. They Are There [b]Because[/b] They Work[/i]

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

View Entire Topic
  • Edited by Intoxicated ODST: 8/8/2017 8:12:18 PM
    So, if the sun is that close, than you should be able to see it get noticeably larger as you ascend into the atmosphere, say on a plane. Is there any evidence of the sun being larger if you go on a high altitude / commercial plane? Also where does this low orbit, smaller sun get its energy from? What is it made from? If it is made from the same particles / works the same (i.e nuclear fusion) as the standard sun model, then it would need to be hundreds of times larger, as estimates for the minimal star size range from around 8.7% the diameter of our sun (from space.com). Even if this mini-star was small enough to fit into your planar model, which it is not [i]my calculations put it at 121,051.8km across, as the sun's diameter is 1.3914 million km 8.7% of 1.3914 million km is 121,051.8 km (it would be appreciated if someone could recheck those calculations thanks)[/i] If it were that size, its density would have to extremely high to cause cause enough pressure to trigger nuclear fusion. Its mass would cause insanely poweful gravitational tidal forces, easily enough to destroy earth completely. TL;DR : Your 'sun' (if it obeys the laws of gravity and nuclear fusion) is an impossibility, proven by us [b]still being alive[/b]. So the question is; does the planar version of our sun behave in the same way our current models of our sun work? (I.e. fusion, pressure, gravity etc) Cheers for reading, [spoiler]also sos for not having the exact url for the space.com article, I lost it. However you can easily find it yourself if you search 'minimum size of a star' [/spoiler]

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    3 Replies
    You are not allowed to view this content.
    ;
    preload icon
    preload icon
    preload icon