{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/3/2017 6:28:04 PM
9
-
theres nothing to pay for that gives any advantage.
-
Oh that's good. I thought players unlocked guns and Titans and stuff. Must be all cosmetic.
-
[quote]So its Titanfall 2 with $20 worth pay-to-win crap.[/quote] If that's how you choose to view it then sure. I'd say its more of a "pay to catch up" than a pay to win. You don't unlock everything and still start at level 1. Everyone else who has the game has everything and has had it for months (it only takes a day or 2 to get to your first regen, by then you have everything unlocked except camos. If they released this edition at launch there would be a problem (looking at you Dice). But a year after launch, this is nowhere near qualifying as pay to win. Just incentive to pick up the game.
-
Edited by DeusFever: 8/3/2017 7:25:54 PMI'm being harsh because I do hate Pay to unlock. The major flaw of the unlock system is that new players are at a disadvantage. Bungie tried to solve this with the Crucible in Destiny by removing the level advantage. EA's solution is to have players spend more $. Blizzards solution is to have cosmetic only unlocks.
-
At least it's not RNG based like everyone other system
-
Tru dat
-
What's better is that even with this catch up stuff, newer players will have a better chance of keeping up, making them play the game more. Plus it helps the game sh## on competition
-
I think of Star Wars Battelfront. I never really kept up with it and going back in 6 months later I felt completely overpowered by players with explosive ammo and much better guns. My son likes Overwatch because he gets all the best guns from the start. I think that's the future of this genre.
-
Unfortunately, maybe. Shame that companies today are complete assholes
