Anyone else thinking this 4v4 is lame? This map is tiny, feels like an old Arena shooter.
English
-
No one can answer that unless they played at the reveal or e3.
-
Why not? People have eyes and can see the gameplay
-
Watching a video and experiencing something are 2 different things. That's usually pretty evident when you have a noob in the raid with you who says I've watched videos and then dies constantly lol
-
Oh I absolutely will try out the beta and am already thinking I will love pve regardless. I'm just skeptical about smaller teams for pvp, and definitely do not like that guns don't have random rolls now. Feels very "not destiny" to me. Hopefully it's awesome or at least they offer different size maps/teams for pvp activities etc. example- Maps with vehicles could be 8v8 etc. The dev's "dumbing down" comment didn't give me good vibes tbh. We shall see.
-
I felt exited to round a corner and see the entire enemy team huddled up, seeing that never ending stream of medal credits start rolling... Double, triple,space magic,payback,slayer, reaper...guardian down...nooooooooo
-
I feel like your lame
-
You feel like his lame... what?
-
Ah, the good old Destiny community of pubescent replies! give you mommy her phone back.
-
Because calling a map "lame" is so insightful and mature.
-
Btw. Zardoz = Great movie . I said changing Destiny pvp to 4v4 feels lame. I said the map is tiny. Reading comprehension.
-
THE PENIS IS EVIL
-
Because putting a z- name -z is so cool.
-
I like the idea of 4 v 4. Doubles and 3 v 3 are my favourite modes in crucible D1. Opinions I guess. Btw. Good job with the name calling. You really got me.
-
See, now you came back with a mature reply. 4v4 could be good, but across the board? I think it's a mistake. Control would be more fun 8v8 etc. if you have a team and finish the raid now you have to split up for some pvp etc.