JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

originally posted in: Remaster Halo Reach?
7/10/2017 6:32:55 AM
9
Lmao no. Reach was -blam!-ing garbage.
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Reach was not as bad as ODST, 4, or 5. Personally, my favorite Halo is 2. What's yours?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • ODST and Halo 5 piss all over lolreach lmfao

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Unfortunately not. The story for Reach was actually good. Halo 5 was disappointing, almost pointless. Though ODST wasn't as horrible as 5, it wasn't the worst Halo. The pacing around the city was slow and dull. My one probably with Reach would be the abilities, but I'll take that ability issue way before taking Halo 5's pointless story anyday.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by High Charity: 7/10/2017 3:48:40 PM
    Ohhh ibget it now, you're just slow is all. ODST's story bears Reach's to a pulp. I'll take better characters with real motives and fleshed out details over retconned garbage shoehorned in to make a single team relevant. Not to mention all of Reach's cast were just boring archetypes with no real reason for their actions. The entire "story" was one plothole after another and they threw in Noble's deaths to try and make it feel like the game had emotion when they were simply just poorly written characters. Oh, and Halo 5's mp is far and away better than anything lolreach could even hope to have. Bungie refused to admit they did anything wrong with Reach. 343 at least attempted to fix it and actually supports their games.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Hang on, you felt a connection to the ODST story? I never did. Jyst saying, that is just your opinion not fact.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Dear god how old are you?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Thanks for defending me. Calling someone "slow" is extremely childish.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • 👍🏻

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I'm really not here to argue. Pointless. I see what you're saying alright. Just like you see what I'm saying. But don't protect Halo 5 like it's perfect. It was the worst rated one I believe. They simply didn't utilized their full potential. At the end of the day both Reach, and 5 have major problems. Both of their stories weren't perfect. And both of their multiplayer weren't perfect. One of the major problems with all the Halo's after Reach is the customization. You can't sit there and tell me the customization in Reach was bad. It was better then all the Halo's. Halo 5 had more armor and options, but it didn't look as awesome as Reach. Reach armor looked so realistic compared to Halo 5's cartoony-looking armor.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon