{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/29/2017 7:36:06 PM
33
Pancakes because you can put -blam!-ing chocolate chips in them
(Did I just say chocolate chips I meant you could put anything in them)
English
-
You can put everything a pancake can in waffles, it's also easier since they have pockets, you are wrong, pancake peasant.
-
I have put chocolate chips in waffles too
-
Waffles...because you can have chicken with them
-
THIS GUY GETS IT
-
Edited by DeMix: 6/29/2017 8:07:43 PMBut can't you put anything on waffles too? What about waffles and chicken? 🍗
-
Finally, someone who isn't a complete disgrace
-
That too
-
Why not pancakes and chicken?
-
Cause it's inferior, it's a worse version of chicken and waffles.
-
I've already had this argument. If you keep reading, you'll see that STALIN preferred waffles, and I do not support the guy that killed 30 million people.
-
Well that makes Stalin less of a bad person. Humans have skin, Hitler had skin, all humans support Hitler, except they don't support Hitler. You are wrong.
-
Tell that to the guy that said Hitler ate pancakes. You might be able to do that if you read the whole argument. I've already been through this, and I shall not reiterate.
-
Tell that to the guy that said Hitler ate pancakes. You might be able to do that if you read the whole argument. I've already been through this, and I shall not reiterate.
-
That's having something in common, not supporting. Also waffles is the right answer, pancakes with pockets.
-
Pancakes don't need pockets. The fluffiness of pancakes allows them to absorb syrup, jelly, and jam. And, other additives, suck as butter or peanut butter are sticky enough to stay without pockets. On top of all that, pancakes are stackable, so it's like eating a layered cake. It's unreasonable to stack waffles. Plus, waffles are too hard and rigid. Pancakes are soft and fluffy. Are we done here?
-
Edited by Chlo: 6/30/2017 8:04:13 PMIt's not as good when absorbed, don't even try to argue with that, it seems like it went away. Some things don't need pockets, but it's not bad when there is pockets. Wtf do you mean by hard and rigid, the person making the waffle must have f[b][/b]ucked it up on purpose if it's like that, some waffles are crispy and crispy is good, but there are waffles that are soft too, if a waffle is hard whoever made the waffle shouldn't be trying to make food at all. And why would you stack pancakes, that is too much, just don't.
-
You're right.
-
Are you kidding? The absorbancy of pancakes is fantastic. You just can't -blam!- it up by drowning the pancakes into liquid. And waffles are normally harder and more rigid than pancakes. Pancakes are softer and fluffier. You're arguing with facts of life. I would argue that a pancake can do anything a waffle can do. They can have all the same sides, syrups, jellies, jams, and all the same batter additives. BUT, waffles cannot stack and need pockets. If you can't see the obvious superiority of pancakes, then there is no point in continuing this argument. Good day.
-
Absorbing isn't good, it tastes like the syrup fades away, but it doesn't, so it's unhealthy for no good reason. Waffles shouldn't be hard, someone fu[b][/b]cked that waffle up on purpose, it's not the waffles fault, and it can be just as soft as pancakes if you make it like that. I'm arguing for the facts of life, waffles are superior. Waffles can do everything a pancake can, they can stack, and no they need pockets but the pockets are there if needed. If you see an obvious superiority in pancakes, you have sight problems, cause it's undeniable that waffles are better.
-
I've never had the syrup taste like it fades away. And -blam!- health, we're literally comparing pancakes and waffles. They're not supposed to be healthy. And let's say that a waffle can be as soft as a pancake, but not every waffle is as soft as a pancake. Do me a favor. Make 1 pancake and 1 waffle. Then hold each by the edge and see which one droops more. And, it's still unreasonable to stack waffles. If you stack five waffles, you have way too much food and the waffles don't flop over each other the way pancakes do. If you stack five pancakes, you don't have too much food and they flop over each other in a way where they won't fall off of each other easily. I've already said that we're not gonna see eye to eye on this stupid argument, so, once again, GOOD DAY. [spoiler]That's another way of saying GOODBYE.[/spoiler]
-
Dude I don't know about you, but I don't wanna get diabetes from my breakfast. How the fuc[b][/b]k is it too much food cause of it's shape, it's the same size with different shape, and 5 of either pancakes or waffles is too much anyway, if it's unreasonable to stack waffles, then it's unreasonable to stack pancakes, they are literally pancakes with pockets. Who the hell is gonna hold a waffle or pancake by the edge, THEY ARE MEANT TO BE EATEN. Bye.
-
You're wrong.(nothing against you personally)
-
You're wrong. Amazing how that works both ways. (Also nothing against you or anyone I've argued with so far. I just really enjoy arguments)
-
You are a bad person
-
Hey! That is completely unrelated to this.
