Massive waste of words and space.
The "pattern" is the same as it ever has been.....there's absolutely nothing new to see here.
End of file.
English
-
Ok thanks.
-
Seriously. We're in a time where the joke exotic of yr 1 and sidearms are now part of the meta. Pvp has been necked down continuously for over 2.5 yrs to a shortened playing field where there's a more neutral, forgiving middle ground where OHK weapons usage has been greatly reduced for most of the player base = mathematically constructed existence for higher probability of success for the masses and a narrowed skill gap for the elite. This is mathematical fact that cannot be refuted. The complaints are the same as they ever have been on this dung heap of a message board. There's nothing left to talk about. Nothing. It's all been said for the same reasons.........and there's no more help left to give. Besides, pvp changes come from spread sheets/stats, not complaints on this board. Period. It's all one huge moot point.
-
This is something that isn't new based on your previous comment, waste of words!
-
Get your IQ buffed and mine nerfed.........then we'll re-visit for a fair fight.
-
I don't mean to burst your bubble but that's not how it works even though I appreciate the comparison
-
......and in other news Arctic Owls are being sighted in increasing numbers in the lower 48.....
-
Well...at least you came back to explain yourself 👍🏻
-
The only possible reason for these threads is self absorbed attention/like/up-vote seeking narcissistic bullshit. I see it circle jerked here all of the time. Game cosmetics? Sure, those get attention here and get results, but the pvp bitching......in Deej's words is "anecdotal".....and exactly correct. Bungie makes pvp [i]business decisions[/i] in order to keep the base engaged and playing (i.e. propping up the newer and less skilled players). End of story.
-
[quote]up-vote seeking narcissistic bullshit[/quote] Not at all. Keep that judgmental attitude going though. It works for you. [quote]in Deej's words is "anecdotal"[/quote] Yes we all know that one. However anecdotal doesn't mean [u]ignored[/u]. It means taking what is being said here and [u]then[/u] using their resources to vet it out to see if it's a legit concern. It means not taking what is said here as scripture. Do you think sniper flinch would have been changed if it wasn't brought up here first? Firebolts? Sure there have been a lot that didn't as well and that's all on them but to blanket say that they don't take feedback into consideration is ignorant.
-
Confirmed. I realize you'll never be able to understand/cope. Have a nice life.