{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Number1 Casual:
8/23/2016 12:43:08 AM
71
-
Agree
-
Give legit reasons why?
-
Because he can't run a mediocre campaign let alone a country. Saying he is not a politician is not a rebuttal or he shouldn't have run for political office.
-
Ur assuming based on speculation just so ya know, it's not an argument.
-
So far, he has had so much success with his campaign, he's just running out of stamina and punchlines. His campaign is great, his support is going down tho. Hillary is the complete oppisite. Trum0 hasn't failed nor will he have failed this campaign, the fact that he has made it here is very impressive and unexpected.
-
Edited by NotGayJared: 8/24/2016 9:14:30 PMSo what ur saying is one of the most wealthy business man in the world can't run things properly....
-
I said he can't run a campaign so I have no confidence that he can run a country.
-
Reasons why "she is better"... Rather than reasons why Trump is crap. (as a moderate, I already know both, but am asking your opinion why she is suited to running a country)
-
[quote]Meh, she's still better than Trump.[/quote] Ok name how and i bet youll give some bs talking point that has no truth to it [spoiler]anyone reading this place your bets before she responds[/spoiler]
-
And I bet that you will say that any response I make is a bs talking point.
-
No i dont work like that try me you have nothing to lose
-
Ok, here is one. He can't even run an effective campaign so how will he run a country?
-
Hes not a politician so i dont expect him to run a campaign great. Obviously im voting for him but i can attack him better than that policy wise. His policy of trade for one or his policy for raising minimum wage. But attacking his campaign is irrelevant because hes created more wealth and jobs than most can dream of. Also speaking of campaigns clintons spent over ten times as much as him yet barely is ahead in the polls
-
He may not be a politician but a good business exec/leader surrounds himself/herself with top talent and listens to them. I would expect this from Trump and would apply to his campaign and his cabinet should he win. He has not done this so far which leads me to believe that he would not be an effective commander in chief.
-
So far Hillary is only surrounded herself with Saudi Arabia and dirty politicians you know she technically lost the nomination right?
-
Edited by Number1 Casual: 8/24/2016 12:53:31 AMOk. That's a bit of a stretch. Care to clarify your point and provide some proof?
-
Which part? It was proven quite recently that her foundation his funding her campaign and most of the donations have come from countries in the Middle East like Saudia Arabia.. the head of the DNC admitted that she cheated for Hillary how do you not know this?
-
Really. Where is your source to prove that the Clinton foundation is funding her campaign? Also, how did the DNC sway the outcome of the democratic nomination? You realize the she recieved more delegates and didn't need the super delegates. Nice try.
-
The head of the DNC openly admitted it then step down out of her position because of it this isn't a deniable thing LOL and Clinton admitted she's using her foundation to fund her campaign and she said as soon as she becomes president will stop accepting money from foreign entities. Are you just not paying attention to the election?
-
Source please, not unsubstantiated talking points.
-
http://usuncut.com/politics/debbie-wasserman-schultz-hillary-clinton/ ^cheated nomination http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2015/apr/20/reince-priebus/hillary-clinton-took-money-kings-four-countries-go/ ^influenced by foriegn dictators
-
Edited by Number1 Casual: 8/24/2016 1:43:22 AMDid you actually read the articles? There is no proof in either that Hillary directly colluded with the head of the DNC to disadvantage Bernice Sanders. The article was written in Dec 2015 before the primaries even started. Also, the Clinton Foundation recieved donations from Saudis but there is no evidence that her campaign recieved any funds from the Saudis or the foundation "Priebus said Clinton took "money from kings of Saudi Arabia and Morocco and Oman and Yemen." [quote]The monarchies of Saudi Arabia, Morocco and Oman have contributed to the Clinton Foundation, but Yemen, which does not have a king, has not. And although Priebus’ claim was made during a discussion of the foundation as well as contributions to political candidates, [b]his phrasing could have left the impression that Clinton herself, rather than the foundation, received the money."[/b][/quote] Nice try.
-
Those aren't even my sources I just Googled it because I'm lazy as f*** let someone else give you proof of it I didn't even read those articles but that's why Bernie Sanders supporters are pissed off because he did get cheated out of the election and that's why the DNC head step down this whole week it's been all over the news she was receiving campaign contributions indirectly from the Middle East through her foundation these are facts not opinions
-
They won't respond, they never do once you back them into a corner.
-
[quote]They won't respond, they never do once you back them into a corner.[/quote] And looks like i won the bet, she used some bs talking point lol
