{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/13/2016 3:03:22 AM
1
So the first link to cnn is essentially useless because they just reported on it and never linked the research, so it's just words. I am unable to see the second document as I'm out of available space, so for the time being I'm going to remain skeptical, although you do raise an interesting case. That being said, I don't think associating with BLM is a very good idea, as many members are blatant racists, wanting segregation and call for killing cops. ALM is probably a more effective movement to associate with, as it is the group that is the most humanitarian. If you can provide a link that isn't download that would be appreciated, and thank you for reading this far I know this is a long post.
English
-
Alright I was able to do a quick read through of the article, and yes what those police were doing was horrible, but as far as I can tell (and I am only human and may have missed a portion that could prove me wrong) the study forgot to adjust for crime rates. Maybe the police made more arrests for back people than white people adjusting for population is that on aggregate the violent crime rates of blacks in American is higher than whites. Here's a link to fbi crime violent crime rates [url=http://www.example.com]https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/table-43[/url]. This could explain some of the extra stops, but multiple for one person is unacceptable. I would like to repeat I only got a quick look at the report, and I am by no means an expert on this subject, so I'm up to debate this if you're willing
