{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/11/2016 4:17:21 PM
31
So I read this thing
Are you serious? This entire PDF was all about stop and searches and how the officers didn't have enough evidence to conduct one but the DoJ also says that they didn't have sufficient evidence to even claim that in the vast majority of cases so they went to isolated cases instead.
They are literally using anecdotes and their lack of comprehensive data to come up with a conclusion. This is scientifically backwards.
English
-
So you read page #33 that talks about illegal strip searches and the 60 complaints within the year that alluded to them? Or the part where instead of being commended for reporting misconduct, honest cops were harrassed by the higher ups and told to "stay in your lane"? Or officers witnessing other officers plant drugs on suspects and being too afraid to report it? Or the excessive force? Or on page 30 where a seargent instructed another officer to "make something up" to justify a bogus stop and frisk? Or page 152 where an officer received 125 complaints and received no disciplinary action? You read all that? You're full of shit.
-
Yes, I did and it fits directly into what I said. The DoJ can't find enough evidence to support their claim that there is systemic anything and so they find the outliers and try to pose that as the average. Your argument is still weakened by the fact that the DoJ admits they don't have conclusive data and are using outliers. And you think complaints mean anything? Really? I can complain that an officer shoved an alien probe up my ass and it would be recorded. You think criminals who are proven to be criminals don't file complaints against the officer?
-
Actually it doesn't fit at all. You discrediting victims is easy, but we all know where there's smoke there's fire. If you wanna be disingenuous that's fine. But you're conveniently ignoring actual cops who were on the force that are verifying the information found in the report. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-watch/wp/2015/06/25/an-interview-with-the-baltimore-cop-whos-revealing-all-the-horrible-things-he-saw-on-the-job/
-
Cops are disembowled, people are decapitated and the people die and do horrible things. Especially in this cesspool of crime and violence. Trying to equivocate this with racism is retarded and won't fix anything. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11292-012-9163-y https://mobile.twitter.com/WORLDSTAR/status/754095334305837056 https://www.1215.org/lawnotes/misc/alleged-police-bias-debunked.pdf
-
Edited by Moon Made Waves: 8/13/2016 2:44:36 AMCops on the force say it's related to race and you wanna stick your fingers in your ears, that's cool bro. What every other travesty in the world has to do with this is completely and utterly sidestepping the overall point. You're gonna link Worldstar? Pathetic.
-
Edited by Apostate: 8/13/2016 2:47:25 AM"Anecdotes say things that must mean it's statistical fact" "The DoJ admits it only has anecdotes so that's totally not anecdotal" "I don't accept black crime because white people are evil"
-
I'll take the data and eye witness reports bruh. You can disregard that if you'd like.
-
I'll take the facts and the fact that the DoJ stated they just were working off anecdotes which, in a scientific community, counts as jack shit Anecdotes are like someone on the internet claiming they have an IQ of 184739 and they are Hawking's dad
-
You keep refusing to acknowledge the firsthand eyewitness reports from cops on the force. Stop deflecting.
-
You keep insisting anecdotal arguments completely make up for the lack of empirical data that the DoJ stated was the case multiple times
-
Hahahaha! You're doing it again! Your sidestepping ability is impressive!
-
Your inability to grasp the concept that testimony means little to nothing in science and statistics shows you lack an education in anything meaningful https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/anecdotal http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-anecdotal-evidence-can-undermine-scientific-results/# Try again when the DoJ has more than anecdotal evidence
-
Right on man, keep sidestepping 🤘
-
>when you have no evidence to prove your claim Kek
-
Deflection!
-
Deflection can only occur when you have evidence You don't
-
Deflection!
-
Dude don't there is no reason to argue with him. He's a self hatred racist of his own skin color and race(claims to be black but says its third) behind French and American wtf? dodges every truth. is full of shit with his run around dodging sentences trying to slap some big words like no one will notice that he responses are hollow. Don't waste your time with an idiot like that.
-
But it's fun. It's especially fun to see him continually ignore the same viable interwoven information then interject his own completely unrelated nonsense. I mean, he linked me to Worlstar! Lmao. Then he stormed off in a rage after fistpumping Michael Browns death. It was really spectacular.
-
Lol yeah it's comical. I read him from the start on who he is and hid bullshit he spits
-
Im going to stop bumping your racism and bigotry and horrible reading skills Cya kiddo
-
Deflection!
-
Shhh. Pointing out faults in methodology makes you a horrible racist.
-
Can't be racist I'm black lol
-
Aw shit. uh... I guess it makes you not a true black person then.
