{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
originally posted in:A R D E N T
7/27/2016 2:53:01 PM
2
Yea and even when there wasn't enough rifles for everyone just telling them to pick up ammo of their dead comrades.
But hell they fought hard and won
English
-
Yep even knowing almost 2 million died in that battle alone
-
If hitler did not send half of his force to take the oil fields he probably would have won.
-
Yea then he just had the whole damn Russian steamroller to deal with which would easily be stopped with more men
-
Hitler could have even won the war if he just had adopted jets early and the sturmgewher early. The Russians would have stood a chance
-
Oh yea mass producing the me-262 would have deffinetly gave him the upper hand
-
Yeah can outgun basically anything else out there. He also should have invaded Britian before it was too late
-
Yea stopping at France was poor planning especially when Britain was alone in the war at the time with America only just getting involved to start sending supplies
-
Would have won, but Hitler not listening to his generals cost him the war
-
Yea when you start to think everyone around you doesn't know what they are doing because they disagree with you then you start to lose the help you had of planning multiple things at once. Hitter was a great leader (of a people not good ideals) and would probably gone down in history as a Great commander of a countries army had he listened.
-
Yes, I can agree he was great leader economically, but his social ideals were horrible
-
Yep that was also a downfall due to resources put into camps
-
