[quote]Make it so the body damage taken from a sniper shot is consistent amongst all snipers. About a 100-110 amount. [/quote]
Why? this still makes snipers a 2 hit weapon to the body.
[spoiler]Most of them anyway.[/spoiler]
English
-
Basically every sniper already is 2 shot to the body.
-
Good. They should be a two hit weapon. The main issue is the exploit that people use that allow them to barely do any sort of damage to get the kill after failing to hit the player in the head. If you get a body shot unless you get another body shot with he sniper, it should not be easy to get a kill with a different weapon.
-
hmm maybe you should stick to just doing patrols.
-
Or maybe people should stop being so self-centered and realize that using exploits in a game does not make you a good player.
-
Its not an exploit. You're just an idiot with a horrible idea who is salty because you get out sniped.
-
You're the one who can't spell "Baggins" correctly. Let's also note that the smartest thing you can come up with are insults. Your brain doesn't contain the processing power to make intelligent comments so it resorts to the bottom-of-the-line actions. Trying to make yourself feel good by bringing down someone else just to end up making yourself look like a moron. Congratulations. You won, claim your free "get an education" card at the door. Hope we never see you again.
-
[quote]You're the one who can't spell "Baggins" correctly.[/quote] Haha thats the way, pick on the spelling of someones gamertag because youve ran out of shitty ideas to make your post sound some what viable. Did it ever occur that maybe the way it was meant to be spelt was already taken? The damage a sniper does is clearly not an exploit though im curious how you think it is?
-
Should one bullet of any non-doctrine primary weapon in the body be enough to take out someone after getting body shotted? Sure if said weapon hits you in the face and does at least 70 damage in the face then sure. Can't do much at that point to change things without completely breaking it. But if that was a Mida and you got hit in the body by only bullet and died after the sniper shot to the body, would you not get frustrated? You would've had barely any time at all the react and/or fight back against it due to how fast the damage could be done when compared to just using the primary in the first place. The fact that the person hit you in the body gives you the sense of "oh I'm in danger" but at the same times also makes you think "oh I can still survive" only to be killed a very short split second later by a completely different weapon from the same person. To not allow a person a fair match by giving them ample opportunity to react at all even if the snipe was not in the head ruins to reason for snipers. The reward for hitting a body should be far less significant than the reward for successfully hitting the head. That should be a given.
-
The stupidity you continuously write is amazing. Theres a reason that your post has been down voted into the ground and i wont sit here arguing with an idiot.
-
Hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliophobia.
-
Also, refer to the last paragraph.
-
[quote]There are pretty good where they are at right now- except for [u]the higher aim assistance in comparison to year one.[/u][/quote] Explain that to me?
-
https://www.bungie.net/en/Forum/Post/208527360/0/0/1 This was a move that Bungie chose to make for some reason.
-
Both LDR year 1 and year 2 and Longbow year 1 and year 2 have a MAX aim assist of 71 and 75 respectively which hasnt changed at all from year 1, the only thing different is its base stat but it cant go any higher or lower then it use to be. AA is something which people thrive one but it wasnt a problem when everyone was running the Efrideets spear which had one fo the lowest aim assists in the game. People put far to much faith in the AA stat of a gun when in reality it makes no noticeable difference.