{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by MentttalChikken:
6/23/2016 12:17:21 PM
428
Why people think striker is op all of a sudden
I main hunter and people all over the forums are complaining how op strikers are. I find this ironic because strikers are relatively the same since launch. Guardians (especially my fellow hunters) are bitching about how op shoulder charge and FoH, only because they have saltyness left over from the last nerf. So on behalf of all hunters; I apologize if we bitch more often than usual. And we can't help it that something in our brain called the frontal bitch lobe is working over time.
Again I apologize,
A SLIGHTLY bitchy hunter
-
4 RepliesPeople said the same thing about MIDA. It's the same as Y1. It's not OP. But it still got the nerf. Fact is, when a rebalance occurs, the balance shifts. So while Striker Titans might be the same as in Y1, the majority of the other classes aren't and the class that didn't change will have a spotlight on it. In this case, with a nerf to throwing knives and trip mines, the balance naturally shifts in favor to shoulder charge and lightning grenades. The spotlight is shone. And at this point, it's obvious that Bungie loves to nerf things that are popular. So I can easily see them showing a graph of the Striker subclass and talking about how lots of players have the shoulder charge and lightning grenade nodes selected and how this justifies a nerf. On the plus side, they'll probably buff other grenades and melees, but it still doesn't change the fact that they nerf things based on how popular they are. At the end of the day though, blame Bungie, not the players. Players might complain, but Bungie has the last word. And we all know what Bungie does when the last word is involved. That's right, I'm ending this post with a pun.
