{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/24/2016 3:18:47 AM
5
gunslingers were the same since launch and nightstalkers since they launched. bladedancers were already hit hard during dark below. hunters deserved none of the shit they got, the graph was bullshit. wtf do you expect when over 50% of destiny players are hunters. why even throw classes on there no one plays (defender). they're trying to justify their shit decisions with bullshit statistics that have no relevance.
English
-
Everyone plays hunter because they are op you donkey. Otherwise more people would play other classes. Jesus christ thats simple human nature. You think they play hunter because their fairy capes look cool? Stay in school buddy.
-
you're a -blam!-ing idiot. hunters have had the highest appeal since beta. in beta mode (before anyone had tried the game numbskull) 66% of people chose the hunter. do some research on it if you want. don't tell me it's because they're op, that just shows me how retarded you are
-
Lmao!! Yeah people play them because they are just popular, in an ultra competitive game! I bet you did great in economics. Stay in school fool.
-
yeah man those skips were op af were their 18 damage damn. that double barrel role was so op like dayummmm :///those trip mines were so op like hell man
-
Same statistics were used to nerf sunbreakers into the ground because they were at a 1.09 average kd, which was apperently considered too high. Are you really surprised that the same data was used on hunters when they had the same or higher average kd to nerf them?
