{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/23/2016 4:09:58 PM
1
If there was an M on the box, the same amount of kids will still be playing it that are playing games like Halo, CoD, BF, CS:GO, Medal of Honor, Rainbow Six, etc. The only thing that is pointless is pretending that the game will suddenly be fixed by putting that M there. Say only 10% of the Destiny community was kids, there's according to Bungie 30 million registered accounts. Say making it M reduced that by 10% again, that's still 2.7 million people that fall under the "17+" M rating playing it.
English
-
Edited by Tamed: 6/23/2016 5:31:16 PMNobody is saying the game will be fixed if there was less kids that played. I honestly don't have a problem with kids playing the game. I was only stating facts. If the game had an M rating, there would be less kids playing it. That is a fact. Your argument is still pointless.
-
The original comment actually said it would be better, therefore [i]your[/i] entire comment chain is irrelevant and off topic to the discussion.
-
No it isn't. You're just trying to make yourself feel better. I was supporting the original commenters point about how having an M rating would mean less kids (by "no kids," I'm sure he or she meant less kids). I did not agree with the part about the game being better with no kids. But I'm glad you know your earlier comments were pointless.
-
I should have guessed from your name you were a special kind of stupid. Oh well.
