{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/8/2016 1:11:09 AM
157
What was the exact moment the Halo series became dead to you?
So,what was that exact moment when you realized Halo had a good run? Don't just generalize it to an entire game, make it that one moment when you said to yourself "Yeah this is -blam!-ing retarded".
For me it's when The Librarian told Chief that ends up the entire SPARTAN program was barely a human creation and it was actually the Forerunners who did everything. Also ends up Master Chief is the chosen one
God dammit 343i not everything has to be related to the forerunners, also what's wrong with making the Chief just some average but bullshit lucky SPARTAN?
-
2 RepliesEdited by Lord of Admirals: 6/8/2016 3:49:49 AM[quote]For me it's when The Librarian told Chief that ends up the entire SPARTAN program was barely a human creation and it was actually the Forerunners who did everything. Also ends up Master Chief is the chosen one[/quote]But let's not forgot that [i]BEFORE[/i] that Bungie revealed that an assembly of AIs have been guiding and controlling humanity's future for ~200 years and were the ones who created the SPARTAN-II program and also initiated first contact with the Covenant. They also did things like coin our terminology/slang, designate which planets we could and couldn't colonize, escalate the insurrection, and select which planets the Covenant glassed next. Speaking of which, if Halo had ended at Reach, and you asked this same question, my answer would be the Reach data pads. In their own respect, it's not a bad premise, but for Bungie's storytelling, it came out of no where and didn't fit the theme of Reach, or the content they'd produced that came before.
