{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
4/23/2016 6:25:37 AM
1
I get your point, and yes golden gun problem gets more kills per use on average but, despite the rather large hit box with golden gun, you still need to aim and shoot. And during this time you are just as vulnerable as any other player if not more cuz it's like having a target painted on your back. A random sniper from across the map or around a corner or most nades can kill u instantly. I'm not saying golden gun is hard to use, just that FoH is a bit simpler.
English
-
I can agree with fist of havock being simplier of use, but I guess I just think in overall use of both of them, as in most the game you're more likely to be at a distance where golden gun is useable than fist of havock. Strikers inhabit the same issues you presented just usually the inverse instead. Unless its a surprise corner panic, most can see you coming a mile away and shotgun before you get the chance. Of course they both have there strengths and weaknesses but I just am tired of the notion that FoH is these easy peasey super in all scenarios when GG and hell even the [i]projectile fist of havock[/i] the warlock possess are running amok
