{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
4/6/2016 7:08:53 PM
1
However, the same math is used on black holes. If it is applied and we have a real world result, if we apply the math that is only altered ever so slightly, if should still hold true. a=vt; therefore v=a/t
English
-
Its more analogous to Newton's law, every action has an equal and opposite reaction, except a white hole requires negative time. As we know, this doesn't happen.
-
Apply space-time in for time and it would theoretically work. Negative space time would be a place it wouldn't expand
-
Edited by The Cellar Door: 4/6/2016 7:18:27 PMSo don't try to say they have to exist, because they don't. As you just proved.
-
Ai'ght, mate. I'm not a believer in them, however I enjoy a debate. What about the Milk-Dromeda deal?
-
I feel like just squashing them together is boring. I'd rather it be named after Carl Sagan or something.
-
If a person, why not a name like Faraday, Newton, Einstein, Bohr, Galileo, or Confucius?
-
Not sure why Confucius made that list lol, but those scientists have distinct scientific things named after them. Farads, Newton's, the plethora of things for Einstein including his own unit, the Galileo mission, etc. I feel like the merger of galaxies is something that captures the interest of the public eye, so I feel like someone who captured this interest and motivated us further in space than ever before is deserving.
-
I like Confucius. He isn't as understood as I think he should be. Some may call him... Confusing.
