{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/31/2016 11:35:42 PM
1
Key question is how much of the force is from the actual blast, and how much comes from secondary reactions in the planet itself.
English
-
Um......planets are not combustible.
-
Theoretically, the planet itself isn't. However, certain materials could react to the blaster bolt, not to mention cataclysmic reactions to a massive energy blast going cleanly through it.
-
It's a laser, lasers don't cause random elements to become combustible.
-
Technically, it's a bolt of hyper-energized particles, more akin to a plasma shot than a laser.
-
No real difference in this case.
-
Theoretically, it's a huge difference. The nature of a Blaster sounds is that it rapidly disperses on impact with a surface. So whatever the Death Star is firing, it's causing subsequent reactions throughout the planet, thus the uniform detonation pattern.
-
There is no evidence that blasters cause things to become combustible.
-
I'm not saying that a standard blaster causes things to magically become combustible. What I'm saying is that the Death Star main cannon, which appears to be a significantly different type of weapon from "standard" blasters, appears to destroy planets from some form of internal reaction.
-
It looks to be a laser. It has never been hinted that it causes chain reactions. So we can't assume it does.
