It means to take something with no stated limit and run with it saying it has no limit. For example in Pokemon the move Protect blocks any move in the game. So if I went around and said "Protect is unbreakable by anything because it can't be broken in game". That would be a no limits fallacy, assuming because something has no stated limit that it has no limit at all.

Wait, but aren't "limits" constantly mentioned in other shows/universes? Take DBZ for example. I believe during the Green people planet (The piccolo kind.), one of the characters mention: "This is it, he's at his limit." This obviously means that he's as powerful as he can become so far. You max level I guess. Limits seem to be more of an "universal" thing in universes. They're constantly mentioned in anime too. I think.

[quote]Wait, but aren't "limits" constantly mentioned in other shows/universes? ------ Depends on the show, sometimes no limit is ever mentioned. ------ Take DBZ for example. I believe during the Green people planet (The piccolo kind.), one of the characters mention: "This is it, he's at his limit." This obviously means that he's as powerful as he can become so far. You max level I guess. Limits seem to be more of an "universal" thing in universes. They're constantly mentioned in anime too. I think.[/quote] ------ Ok, but that doesn't mean because someone has a limit that is not known, that he is limitless.

[quote]Ok, but that doesn't mean because someone has a limit that is not known, that he is limitless.[/quote] The "limiter" or "limits" is the thing that Saitama broke. He didn't go past it, or "surpass it." He utterly broke it, meanings it's not even there anymore. Through a complete joke of a method. This is speculated or theorized to basically he mean that since he has no limit, his power is limitless. Plus he's still a joke of character, so it's not like he takes combat seriously. (Unless you call him bald. XD)