{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by remige:
3/18/2016 10:33:42 AM
9
[quote]7. [b]Sex education[/b]. Sex ed is already lacking, even for straight people. "Abstinence only" sex ed has been proven to be completely ineffective, and yet it is still widely taught across the country. But even more unfortunate is that sex ed in schools is entirely heteronormative. If you're gay or trans and need to learn about the birds and the bees, heterosexual sex ed isn't going to be very useful. In order for all people, regardless of gender identity or sexual orientation, to be able to enjoy [i]safe[/i] sex, sex ed must account for everyone, not just straight people.[/quote]
Woah, woah, woah! I don't care if you're gay, but learn yourself if it really means that much to you. Gay sex is [b]NOT[/b] how it's meant to be done on a natural level, so it would be redundant to add to the curriculum. It could affect you for the rest of your life. Gay sex carries no such implications and has a much lower risk of damage.
English
-
[quote][quote]7. [b]Sex education[/b]. Sex ed is already lacking, even for straight people. "Abstinence only" sex ed has been proven to be completely ineffective, and yet it is still widely taught across the country. But even more unfortunate is that sex ed in schools is entirely heteronormative. If you're gay or trans and need to learn about the birds and the bees, heterosexual sex ed isn't going to be very useful. In order for all people, regardless of gender identity or sexual orientation, to be able to enjoy [i]safe[/i] sex, sex ed must account for everyone, not just straight people.[/quote] Woah, woah, woah! I don't care if you're gay, but learn yourself if it really means that much to you. Gay sex is [b]NOT[/b] how it's meant to be done on a natural level, so it would be redundant to add to the curriculum. It could affect you for the rest of your life. Gay sex carries no such implications and has a much lower risk of damage.[/quote]
-
[quote]Gay sex carries no such implications and [u]has a much lower risk of damage[/u].[/quote] I take it that you haven't read up on all of the things that can go wrong with anal sex, even for straight people?
-
Edited by remige: 3/18/2016 3:54:35 PM*damaging your lifestyle And I'm talking the normal way, not genetalia in alien places
-
The main problem is that STDs can still be transmitted via gay ex.
-
Which means it is no different than your standard education. Well, okay, what should be your standard education.
-
They shouldn't even try it if they're going to contract a disease.
-
Then the same goes for straight people with STDs. Sex is a no no for them two if it is for LGBTPQ people with STDs.
-
Listen. If you want a child, you have regular sexual intercourse. You don't need to have gay sex to produce a child. It doesn't work that way.
-
Many straight people, especially in today's society have sex for [i][u][b]fun, for the pleasure[/b][/u][/i] so what is wrong if LGBTPQ people do it also?
