{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by lee293:
3/18/2016 2:17:05 PM
42
Pretty good, except for Sex-Ed... I really do not want to learn about gay sex
Edit: Woah just came back... 30 replies
English
-
Why? Because you lack maturity? Or is it that you're just secretly insecure about your sexuality?It's just sex dude. Heterosexual couples have anal sex too...
-
Because it's something I would not engage in. Sure, gays might not engage in heterosexual sex, but then again; sex ed is for the education of reproductive sex, and how to properly engage in it without causing unnecessary pain to your partner (foreplay and the such)
-
Maybe because he doesn't care? I certainly don't care about any sex Ed, it never helped me. The way I see it the idiots who can't figure that stuff out deserves an std
-
In sexed you learn about every major STD and STI. You also learn about protection and anal. [spoiler]You may think you are a forum hero expressing yourself, but I'm here to tell you that no one cares. [/spoiler]
-
Never said I was a hero. I really don't give a shit what you think or what any one thinks for that matter. I'm just saying it's stupid how guys are too immature to talk about anal sex because it's two guys yet they'll go look up some lesbian porn. Or they'll be cool with lesbians being talked about in sex Ed. Never said I was a hero. Or that I ever wanted to be.
-
there is absolutely nothing immature about disagreeing with homo-sex. The intent of sex is reproduction, thats all the education you need about the subject from a school.
-
How many times is sex used for reproductive reasons in life?
-
The schools do not need to teach every aspect of every subject. Knowing the intent and development of reproductive organs is sufficient for public education is it not?
-
I don't think reproduction is the intent. I don't think it should be taught as the only reason.
-
nature. thats why.
-
Nature? There is nothing natural about how we teach/learn. I mean hello we are talking over the internet.
-
who is taking over the internet? gays? NATURALLY, we reproduce. All pleasure drive aside, we have these reproductive organs to do just that, reproduce.
-
That's not what we use them for though.
-
i dont want to know what you do with your... stuff... on your free time but its designed to do one thing (with many many side effects) regardless of what you think.
-
Haha. Yeah, mine is highly unlikely to ever be able to do the one thing you say it is designed to do. Not everyone works properly down there. I was always taugh "you have unprotected sex, you will get pregnant," that totally set me up for a personal fall. Also, I'm sure that there are still things I don't know on the subject at my age. It seens you only really know about it if you try it now. I mean, basic health care to prevent things like thrush and UTI's. I guess on that front it's mostly a female issue. However would it kill guys to know these things?
-
I dont have a problem with learning opposite-sex functions in school, i was directing this at the gay stuff. Sorry for your... inconvenience.
-
Define "gay stuff" and why you wouldn't want to learn about it?
-
Like i said originally, gay sex is not something public schools are responsible for. If you want to learn about it go for it, but it does the public no good to know gay sex above trade certification (as an example). Its wasted time and resources. Gay stuff being literally gay sex.
-
Soo, anal sex(it isn't just for "gay,"? I think it's useful to learn that it has a few more risks than usual sex. I think it should be taught. Not teaching that is in my eyes irresponsible. Oral sex, again I think it should be taught as it still has risks. It's also not "gay"... so what I am really asking is what specifically shouldn't be taught... you even said you weren't against both genders learning the same... soo... I don't get where you are getting the: "no gay sex,"
-
Where I'm from we learn about anal sex. We learn that is can tear the intestinal lining in your anus and give you AIDS. [spoiler]pretty neutral to me. [/spoiler]
-
exactly. No gay sex. You can teach about the organs, the dangers, the diseases, but not gays. Why? because it does not belong in school. Teach what needs to be taught, nothing more. If you want to know more, there is more than enough outside knowledge to educate yourself with.
-
O.o Right. It takes no time to say at the start of the lesson, these acts can be between anyone and any gender. It's not about wasting time to you is it? It's about your own anti-gay feelings.
-
Honestly, sexual orientation is a preference, yes? Religious beliefs are a preference, yes? Not to change topics, but if schools are to be unbiased about religion then they should not endorse a sexual preference. They may speak neutrally about the topics, but there is no need to go in depth about either. Also, this is anomaly we are talking about, and whatever "gay sex ed" she wants is clearly more than generic information. So to stay safe on these topics, its best to remain neutral on the matter. Personally, i very much dislike gays, but i can respect your rights as a citizen of the United States just like everyone else.
-
Schools still teach religion! Even religious schools still teach about other religions. You don't have to endorse something to teach it. My highschool science teacher was crazy christian. It was an interesting querk if I'm honest. He would always disclaim that he didn't believe what he was teaching. We were like: "Dude, it's science."
-
read my post carefully. Its ok to teach moderately and equally. Its not okay to teach the crazy feminazi bs that anomaly may or may not want. Ive never seen anything biased against gays during my public school years. Social norms differed, however.
