{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/19/2016 2:59:30 AM
3
What the actual fúck people. I guarantee AT LEAST 70% of everyone who voted yes and actually meant it thinks they are above it. This is depressing. "Sure, lets have one, but as long as I'm not part of it." Smh
English
-
Edited by Professor Goodfeels: 2/19/2016 3:04:23 AMI said it could be a genocide of anything of their choice. Weeaboos, Furries, things like that. So technically, they could consider themselves excluded from something like that. And you're saying that all who took 'yes' seriously, would consider themselves excluded? Honestly, I voted yes on my own thread, and I know I would most likely be caught in the crossfire, and I'm okay with that. So why be an ass to all of us and disrespect our opinion, when we accept yours? To quote you, "smh."
-
First, I said most, not all. Some people have legitimate arguments and I respect those, such as yourself apparently. I am referring to other posts I have seen. Sorry if i offended you, but others have the same mentality I have outlined. Maybe 70% is an exageration, but the point still stands with a smaller number.
-
My apologies then, I misread it and thought you were assuming that all people who voted yes had the same mentality. No, I would seriously vote yes if I had full control over what the genocide was for. In which I would genocide Weeaboos, hardcore feminists, Furries, Gimmick Users and Roleplayers. Although it isn't a very realistic situation, if I had control, I'd take the chance. But otherwise, I wouldn't endorse it, but I know I couldn't stop it, so I'd just accept it. Although I get where you're coming from.
