{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/12/2016 11:50:09 AM
8
In my opinion, Thorn is no more dangerous than any other primary. If it's a 1v1 gun fight, it can be won 8/10 times by a non-Thorn user. If you're getting team-shot by 2 or more Thorns, then yeah, you're going down, but that's no different than being team-shot by any other primary or combination of primaries.
All the Thorn drama is redundant.
English
-
Silly you. Thorn users never stay a full gunfight if they are losing it lol they run away as their buddy comes in with a firebolts and another thorn. Here, you still haven't even begun to regen because..... Thorn. Very fair indeed.
-
Don't know where you got 8/10 the fire rate with a 3 shot body kills faster than most primaries.
-
That statistic is from my own experience recently in CD. I've won 80% of my 1v1 encounters with Thorn users.
-
That could be a lot of factors put. Any good player will kill you more with thorn than you kill them
-
Maybe you should get a bit better then?
-
From the person I'm better than
-
Apparently not when it comes to battling Thorn users. ;)
-
I didn't say I can't handle them. I just think there shouldn't be a weapon with that kind of fire rate and shots to kill
