{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Recon Number 54:
1/11/2016 1:41:15 PM
8
It is (IMO) "dead" in the fact that both its initial purpose (to give violent medieval men a code of conduct to keep from killing innocents at whim) and its later inference that it was a way for "proper gentlemen to behave when it came to the more fair and weaker sex" are no longer socially relevant or necessary.
I believe that the modern standards of common courtesy and mutual respect for the dignity of others has taken its place and doesn't require gender roles in order to be beneficial to everyone involved.
English
-
[quote]It is (IMO) "dead" in the fact that both its initial purpose (to give violent medieval men a code of conduct to keep from killing innocents at whim) and its later inference that it was a way for "proper gentlemen to behave when it came to the more fair and weaker sex" are no longer socially relevant or necessary. I believe that the modern standards of common courtesy and mutual respect for the dignity of others has taken its place and doesn't require gender roles in order to be beneficial to everyone involved.[/quote]
-
You totally took the smart route on this -_-
-
[quote]You totally took the smart route on this -_-[/quote] I don't know about that. I gave my thoughts on the matter. If they are somehow "smart"? It's not my doing.
-
OP was talking about the game Chivalry.
-
Then why include the definition of the term "chivalrous" relating to social interactions?
-
This is awkward. I thought OP was talking about the game and not actual chivalry... Um I'll think twice about not reading the body paragraphs...
-
Rekt haha [spoiler]its ok i do the same -_-[/spoiler]
-
Yeah I know I was rekt I didn't want to say it though.
