{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/3/2015 6:37:13 AM
1
Well they outclass year 2 weapons simply because they can be rerolled to make them perfect. It takes away the meaning of finding a good weapon off the start, because you can simply reroll a year one weapon til your satisfied. It also takes away weapon variety because people would infuse there elemental primaries. I personally have a lot of amazing year 1 legendaries but I already know that if I were able to infuse, I'd never use a year 2 weapon
English
-
What if they removed the ability to re-roll? They already [i]severely[/i] nerfed virtually every Year 1 perk, so any previously "perfect" weapons are no longer nearly as powerful as they were, before. Pretty sure that's an easy fix to the problem, no? [b]And, as for elemental primaries[/b]; there has never been a [i]single[/i] instance where someone choosing to use an elemental primary has, in any way, hindered [i]another[/i] player's experience. I get that Bungie wants players to use a wider array of weapons, but that's for [i]their[/i] sake; any choices they make should be for the [i]players'[/i] sake, and, in this case, the best choice for bettering [i]player[/i] experience would be to keep implementing elemental primaries, because it doesn't hurt [i]anyone[/i].
