{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/17/2015 9:17:16 PM
1
[quote]Oh Em Gee. Either show respect and respond back to what he actually said in the debate YOU started or gtfo. =P
Its highly intelligent to disagree with someone and then completely ignore everything they say instead of having a legitimate debate. Heaven forbid you might actually be proven wrong, am I right? Perish the thought.[/quote]
Well actually [i]you[/i] started it by making this topic... Just pointing that out that you were asking for people like me to prow you wrong.
And I can't see this being a legitimate debate because you're arguing a stupid fanboy point. (And also someone already disproved you for me...)
English
-
[b]1:[/b] Didn't start this thread. Do you even read, bro? [b]2:[/b] The post itself is making the general challenge for someone to put forth a good reason for why Year 1 shouldn't continue ascending. You picked up that gauntlet and then when Attila replied you totally ignored what he said, side stepping it entirely. [b]3: [/b]How is Infusion for all weapons and armor regardless of what year they are from considered a fanboy point? You serious? O_o [b]4: [/b]I didn't see anyone disprove anything? Rookies. =P
-
No I just assumed it was you because you were defending his opinion so valiantly, my bad lol. And? I have no obligation to further continue my arguments after my initial points so sorry for not wanting to feed your fire further... Because instead of playing the game the way the developers want you to and get new weapons as you progress you want to keep your statistically superior Yr1 weapons. Dragon4290 disproved it, have a look
-
Myself and many others all just happen to share his sentiments on this matter and agree with everything he has said. Also, you are technically obligated to continue by social standards. I mean if you were in a room with him in real life and he posed that challenge and you spoke up, do you really think it would be "acceptable" to call him wrong and then ignore him after the fact? If you wouldn't do that in person, why do it on the internet? That's just disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing then. Likewise, as far as Dragoon goes, I've already quite thoroughly thrashed that whole argument in this same exact thread: https://www.bungie.net/en/Forum/Post/163132037/0/0 Year 1 weapons aren't statistically superior. That's just ridiculous. That's about as ridiculous as claiming Red Death and Bad Juju were too OP so they couldn't be ascended like the rest, and yet there are Year 2 versions with the EXACT SAME EVERYTHING as the Year 1 models. Attila is right, there is literally no good reason for all of Year 1 NOT to be brought forward.
