{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by DarthBrando:
10/16/2015 5:09:12 PM
1
[b][i][u]you do realize the FDA has ignored 100% of all findings from every single independent college funded research lab (colleges like Harvard BTW) ever done on the substance right?! [/u][/i][/b]
Also pls read these;
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=criminalization+of+marijuana&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart&sa=X&ved=0CBoQgQMwAGoVChMI8uu0qb3HyAIVhsk-Ch2ngw8j
And this;
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_history_of_cannabis_in_the_United_States
English
-
I never specified the university. I'm almost positive it came from UC Berkeley. I never read anything from FDA without a healthy skepticism. However when several more sources including the same autorities which passed the law in Colorado are all concluding that the cannibis in Colorado is nearly out of medicinal uses due to the artificially high levels of THC being used exclusively to achieve a greater high. Stop dodging my point.
-
Edited by DarthBrando: 10/16/2015 5:27:01 PMIm not even saying just medicine; Marijuana has 15000+ [b][i][u]PATENTED OR PATENT PENDING USES[/u][/i][/b] It was not made illegal cuz it gets you high and original post did not say that specific use of it either---> thats what im saying On criminalization of it; Ive offered historical proof; legal proof and academic proof of that.
-
Ok. I see the way this is going. It seems I am not feeding the argument you want and you are not feeding my points either. I don't see a point in arguing if we can't establish a common ground to begin. This is in no way a concession. I just can't see continuing to post points you are simply going to ignore.
-
Edited by DarthBrando: 10/16/2015 7:09:53 PMNvm what i had in this response bout proportional response wrong thread sry lol An yea thats fine
-
Lol it's ok.
