{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/7/2015 4:40:48 AM
9
You do realize sword logic basically says might makes right, right? So you can if you use the travellers light to conquer and win against one like oryx your proving your logic is correct and his is false.
English
-
technically you would be proving sword logic is correct as oryx himself says that anyone that beats him without dying is strong in the world and worthy to live. if u destroyed him wth the traveler u would be proving the traveler worthy
-
Actually no, you're only proving that you deserve to exist, and that he doesn't deserve to exist. It doesn't mean you are correct, just that you're the one who deserves to go on by earning it through winning.
-
Either way, it's stupid AF.
-
Not really it's a basic truth of the world. If i walk up to kick the crap out of and take your food. I live and you die. Their is no right or wrong it just is that simple truth. The reason humans don't practise this is because we have the rule of law to keep that truth in check. If you read the alpha lupi grim you quivkly notice each faction the darkness supports follows. The rule of law. The rule of army. The rule culture.... now the darkness thinks the rule of the army is the only right answer. Except alpha luip noticed what if a race had all 3... What happens then... And thus why we have a army to break the enemy a city to call home and base ourselves and a rule of law to stop the other too going to far
-
Edited by Demagogue: 10/7/2015 1:20:33 PMProve it. Prove it. No, the reason we don't follow it is because it's a shitty system, in other words, wrong. I have no idea what anything else you wrote is supposed to mean.
-
How I am wrong please explain... i gave you an example and you need to disprove my example in order for me to futher explain... That's how debate works. It's like asking someone to prove 2+2=4 and then demanding to know why 4 is 4
-
Edited by Demagogue: 10/7/2015 3:32:28 PMBut I just did disprove it. To elaborate- Society can't function if people can just walk around killing each other. Humans are cooperative because that is the only way to progress as a species. Your "truth" is not actually a truth.
-
Disagree our society as we know can't function if we go around killing each other. But the world you enjoy simply exists because union was a stronger fighting force than the confridation. USA Is independent because it was a stronger fighting force the UK. The UK built it's empire on kicking the crap out of everyone and only those strong enough to put up a fight where left alone. Simply put the human race as we know was built on blood and voliance and only those strong enough to get killed got to decided what happened next. That is a simple fact. If i wanted to kill you and take your stuff their is nothing to stop me to doing so. The only reason are world works the way it does is because we as a collective agreed to follow the rules. Their is littlary nothing stopping everyone in a city just going -blam!- this and stealing everything under the sun. It would be chaos and the only people left would be those strong enough to look after their shit. The law only works because enough people choose to follow it
-
Edited by Demagogue: 10/7/2015 10:53:28 PMFine, society as good as or better than ours would cease to function. Why such a technical ass? Union, Confederation, USA, UK, all cooperate(d) a -blam!- ton. Just not with each other for brief periods of time. None are (were) run by a single alpha dog who murdered everyone else. Your "examples" make no sense. Lolno. If it's fact, prove it. Then why don't you do it, internet tough guy? No shit. [i]Then why don't they do it?[/i] [i]No shit.[/i]
